I’ve often joked with my students that the word “wiki” conjures up an image of a DJ scratching a vinyl disc back and forth. The resulting audible would be…”wiki wiki wiki whack.” Of course this is all artfully acted out in front of the class. It always brings a few chuckles.
This assignment, and wikis in general, did not thrill me as much as I’d expected. While watching the introductory video, I was excited about the collaborative aspect wikis bring to Web 2.0; however, in my investigating, I found that too many cooks in the kitchen is not always a good thing.
The first wiki I visited was Westwood Schools Computer Science because I’ve become a fan of Vicki Davis’ blog. I was overwhelmed (I’m using this word quite often these days!) by all of the information contained within this one wiki. Ms. Davis included her four classes, an archive of previous classes, and her class schedule on the home page. Each class then had it’s own page that outlined assignments, projects, assessments, etc. I really enjoyed these pages, although I was unsure as to how the students participated. It appeared to be more of a “read-only” informational piece for the students to follow throughout the term. Beyond her classes, Ms. Davis also included pages for awards and news. This is where the true confusion set in as I was unsure as to how they related to her class pages. I feel that the awards and news pages may have been better served in their own wiki.
The next wiki I researched was Code Blue, set up by sixth graders learning about the human body. The home page was not very engaging, as it was comprised of a list of websites on anatomy and physiology. The left sidebar contained the collaborative information from the students, however, it was not organized very well. An outline form or table of contents would have been better choices. I was amused by the students’ work which included doctor biographies and patient histories. Nice job!
Schools in the Past was very entertaining. First grade students interviewed their parents and grandparents to find out what school was like “way back when.” The answers were split into the following categories: playgrounds, library, number of students in class, what was studied, school rules, and anything else that was different. While I chuckled my way through many of the answers, the material itself was not organized well. It was difficult to determine where one answer finished and another one started. The font was not exciting and it lead to a harder read. Overall, the wiki had great content that could have been presented in a more reader-friendly format.
One of my favorite wikis was the Thousands Project, published by a class of fifth-graders from Duluth, Minnesota. Each month the students posed a question to their worldwide audience and their goal was to receive one thousand responses to each question. Each person (or class) that responded then became collaborators in the wiki. The home page was well-planned and easy to read. The response pages were formatted nicely as well. As I teach fifth grade, I look forward to introducing my class to Mr. Monson’s class this fall.
After reading Vicki Davis’ blogpost, Wiki Wiki Teaching, I thought about how I could incorporate wikis into my classroom. The idea of having the students collaborate and create their own study guide really fascinated me and I am eager to try this approach with our first novel study. Hopefully the results will be smoother than the DJ’s vinyl discs!